Well-written and thoughtful reflections on the strengths, weaknesses,Īdequately written l reflections on the strengths, weaknesses, Poorly written evaluations of the articles, or ones that do notĬonsider most of the following criteria: evidence, bias, fallacies and relevance Some of the following criteria: evidence, bias, fallacies and relevance to Well-written evaluations of the articles that consider theĮvidence, bias, fallacies and relevance to today’s society.Īdequately written evaluations of the articles, or ones that consider Poorly written summaries or ones that do not identify the author’sĬredentials, purpose or audience, and leave out significant parts of theĪuthor’s argument including conclusion, major reasons, and assumptions. Purpose and audience as well as the author’s conclusion, major reasons andĪdequately written summaries, or ones that include most of the following:Īuthor’s credentials, purpose and audience as well as the author’sĬonclusion, major reasons and assumptions regarding the topic. Well –written summaries that include the author’s credentials, One or no scholarly sources are included.
Many sources are suspect and / or not cited correctly. Name of the group member who contributed each entry is not provided. At least 2 scholarly sources are included. Most sources used are credible and cited correctly. Name of the group member who contributed each entry is provided. Your paper will be evaluated based on the following rubric.Īll sources used are credible and cited correctly using APA Only one member of your group needs to submit the paper. Be sure all contributing group members names appear on the paper. Your group paper is due Friday at 11:59pm. Be sure to review all of the entries (not just your own) and proofread carefully.Īll members of the group will receive the same grade. Your final draft will include:Ī true collaboration requires that all group members take responsibility for the final group product. Keep in mind, that in APA format, the entries should be listed in alphabetical order based on the last name of the author. Your final draft of your MAB will follow the same format as your first draft, which you completed on Worksheet 2. Should match the number of people in your group (if each member contributes atĪlso include at least 3 scholarly sources. The number of entries in your final project You may choose the strongest entry from each group members’ first draftĪnd revise it based on the feedback that was received from the critic. Least one entry prepared by each group member. Include research that represents more than one perspective on the issue and at Your research and prepare your Modified Annotated Bibliography. During Week 10, you will be collaborating with your group to combine
0 kommentar(er)
